Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170814164227.GJ20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 17:42:27 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/30] ARM: assembler: introduce adr_l, ldr_l and str_l
 macros

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:22:39PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 14 August 2017 at 17:18, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, Dave Martin wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 04:38:02PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> > That's a trick, actually, which I failed to add a comment for.
> >
> > Shame shame shame !
> >
> >> > We use .arm sections in the thumb2 kernel, and using these macros
> >> > there would result in the wrong offset to be used. Adding the .w
> >> > suffix forces an error in the assembler which even results in a fairly
> >> > meaningful error message complaining about using .w in ARM code.
> >>
> >> Ewww... I think it'd be best to add a comment explaining that.
> >
> > Absolutely!
> >
> 
> Yeah, mea culpa.
> 
> But if people have better ideas how to avoid this situation, I am all ears.

Have you tested building an ARMv7M kernel with your patches - ARMv7M is
Thumb only, so can't contain any ARM code.  If not, please try
mps2_defconfig.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.