|
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1708141217150.17016@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:18:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/30] ARM: assembler: introduce adr_l, ldr_l and str_l
macros
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 04:38:02PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > That's a trick, actually, which I failed to add a comment for.
Shame shame shame !
> > We use .arm sections in the thumb2 kernel, and using these macros
> > there would result in the wrong offset to be used. Adding the .w
> > suffix forces an error in the assembler which even results in a fairly
> > meaningful error message complaining about using .w in ARM code.
>
> Ewww... I think it'd be best to add a comment explaining that.
Absolutely!
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.