[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170730195401.GA4243@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 21:54:01 +0200
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 03:38:44PM +0200, Solar Designer wrote:
> As a moderator, I reluctantly accepted this message on kernel-hardening,
> and rejected its copy sent a bit later to oss-security - it's more than
> enough to have this on one of these two lists.
>
> No followups to it, please. Let's focus on actual kernel hardening, not
> on the drama.
Two things were pointed out to me off-list:
1. nisus@...chan is the same person as aconcernedfossdev, who had made
noise in here and on other mailing lists before, and was already banned
from here. Here's a posting from nisus@...chan where he or she
effectively confirms they were also aconcernedfossdev:
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2017/07/30/114
2. Me letting the posting through yet not allowing any followups in the
same thread makes this one thread one-sided. I have to agree, so if
Brad or/and PaX Team want to post any reply, they may. And that will
end the thread.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
