[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLjZHjHj+kCU3qGzyc4RgjyFmDRJNrsxL_yhEz-qwqpXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:40:57 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Hans Liljestrand <liljestrandh@...il.com>
Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] gcc-plugins: adds MPXK gcc plugin
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Hans Liljestrand
<liljestrandh@...il.com> wrote:
> Adds a gcc-plugin that modifies vanilla GCC MPX instrumentation for
> in-kernel use. Also adds MPXK_CFLAGS Makefile variable that can be used to
> selectively enable MPXK for specific kernel objects. This plugin is not
> enabled kernel-wide and must be explicitly enabled in the appropriate
> Makefile.
>
> The purpose of the plugin is to replace BNDSTX+BNDLDX bound storage with
> our own mpxk_load_bounds function and to replace memory mainpulating
> function with corresponding wrapper function. The plugin accomplishes
> this via the following tasks:
>
> - It adds MPXK-wrappers functions for memory altering functions, e.g.
> kmalloc, memcpy, etc. This is needed both to check bounds for input
> argument pointers and properly set bounds for returned pointers. This
> is done by the mpxk_wrappers compiler pass. (This could potentially
> be done, for better performance, by direct instrumentation at the call
> site.)
>
> - Replace BNDLDX calls with mpxk_load_bounds function calls. This
> includes two separate cases: free-standing loads handled by the
> mpxk_bnd_store pass, and loads in function prologues that are handled
> by the mpxk_cfun_args pass. These are needed for situation where the
> compile time instrumentation cannot determine a way to statically
> propagate the bounds via the stack or registers.
>
> - The final mpxk_pass_sweeper removes any remaining BNDLDX/BNDSTX calls.
Since this creates multiple files for a single plugin, can you instead
relocate these into a subdirectory (which should be supported by the
build system already).
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
