[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170719175900.124074-3-thgarnie@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:59:00 -0700
From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
leonard.crestez@....com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64/syscalls: Move address limit check in loop
The original bug was reported on arm but I am fixing arm64 too because
it has a similar code pattern.
The work pending loop can call set_fs after addr_limit_user_check
removed the _TIF_FSCHECK flag. To prevent the infinite loop, move the
addr_limit_user_check call at the beginning of the loop.
Fixes: cf7de27ab351 ("arm64/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return")
Reported-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
index e3e3293d1123..8e2705983e1d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -751,10 +751,10 @@ asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs,
*/
trace_hardirqs_off();
- /* Check valid user FS if needed */
- addr_limit_user_check();
-
do {
+ /* Check valid user FS if needed */
+ addr_limit_user_check();
+
if (thread_flags & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) {
schedule();
} else {
--
2.14.0.rc0.284.gd933b75aa4-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
