|
Message-ID: <20170714152503.GC16687@leverpostej> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:25:03 +0100 From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Takahiro Akashi <akashi.takahiro@...aro.org>, Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org> Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: add VMAP_STACK and detect out-of-bounds SP On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:03:51PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 14/07/17 15:39, Robin Murphy wrote: > > On 14/07/17 15:06, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> add sp, sp, x0 // sp = orig_sp + orig_x0 > >> sub x0, sp, x0 // x0 = orig_sp > >> < check > > >> sub x0, sp, x0 // x0 = orig_x0 > > > > Haven't you now forcibly cleared the top bit of x0 thanks to overflow? > > ...or maybe not. I still can't quite see it, but I suppose it must > cancel out somewhere, since Mr. Helpful C Program[1] has apparently > proven me mistaken :( > > I guess that means I approve! > > Robin. > > [1]: > #include <assert.h> > #include <stdint.h> > > int main(void) { > for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++) { > for (int j = 0; j < 256; j++) { > uint8_t x = i; > uint8_t y = j; > y = y + x; > x = y - x; > x = y - x; > y = y - x; > assert(x == i && y == j); > } > } > } I guess we have our first Tested-by for this series. :) Thanks for taking a look! Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.