[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5954C262.9000502@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:03:30 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
CC: keescook@...omium.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, labbott@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Provide linux/set_memory.h
On 06/29/2017 08:29 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Currently code that wants to use set_memory_ro() etc, needs to include
> asm/set_memory.h, which doesn't exist on all arches. Some code knows
> it only builds on arches which have the header, other code guards the
> inclusion with an #ifdef, neither is ideal.
>
> So create linux/set_memory.h. This always exists, so users don't need
> an #ifdef just to include the header.
>
> When CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY=y it includes asm/set_memory.h,
> otherwise it provides empty non-failing implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Looks good to me, thanks!
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
I'm fine if Andrew or Kees picks up the bpf patch as well, I think
there shouldn't be any conflict with net-next on this one (and even
if so, then looks trivial to resolve).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
