[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLHOjg9+8xDSzs2nLKjoqUf3NAc_0a1Coo+4WnDYRT3=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 06:52:24 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: Reduce ELF_ET_DYN_BASE
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> On 22 June 2017 at 18:06, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> Now that explicitly executed loaders are loaded in the mmap region,
>> position PIE binaries lower in the address space to avoid possible
>> collisions with mmap or stack regions. For 64-bit, align to 4GB to
>> allow runtimes to use the entire 32-bit address space for 32-bit
>> pointers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 13 ++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
>> index 5d1700425efe..f742af8f7c42 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
>> @@ -113,12 +113,13 @@
>> #define ELF_EXEC_PAGESIZE PAGE_SIZE
>>
>> /*
>> - * This is the location that an ET_DYN program is loaded if exec'ed. Typical
>> - * use of this is to invoke "./ld.so someprog" to test out a new version of
>> - * the loader. We need to make sure that it is out of the way of the program
>> - * that it will "exec", and that there is sufficient room for the brk.
>> + * This is the base location for PIE (ET_DYN with INTERP) loads. On
>> + * 64-bit, this is raised to 4GB to leave the entire 32-bit address
>> + * space open for things that want to use the area for 32-bit pointers.
>> */
>> -#define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE (2 * TASK_SIZE_64 / 3)
>> +#define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
>> + 0x000400000UL : \
>> + 0x100000000UL)
>>
>
> Why are you merging this with the COMPAT definition?
It seemed like the right thing to do since a single definition could
handle both cases. Is there something I'm overlooking in the arm64
case?
-Kees
>
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>
>> @@ -173,8 +174,6 @@ extern int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>
>> -#define COMPAT_ELF_ET_DYN_BASE (2 * TASK_SIZE_32 / 3)
>> -
>> /* AArch32 registers. */
>> #define COMPAT_ELF_NGREG 18
>> typedef unsigned int compat_elf_greg_t;
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
