[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1498070869.13083.22.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:47:49 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Qualys Security Advisory
<qsa@...lys.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org"
<x86@...nel.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Dmitry Safonov
<dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Grzegorz Andrejczuk <grzegorz.andrejczuk@...el.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] binfmt_elf: Use
ELF_ET_DYN_BASE only for PIE
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 13:32 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 10:28 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > The stack rlimit calculation fix for space potentially lost to
> > > ASLR
> > > is
> > > probably still needed too, right?
> >
> > Yes. Was that picked up by akpm already?
> >
> > -Kees
>
> I think it was dropped when the ET_DYN changes were dropped.
I can resend those.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
