|
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rgVXkRfxEhJDu+LmAG64PT=NsJH3se_0ffPPXF=a8q+g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 23:21:55 +0200 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> To: Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, David Safford <safford@...ibm.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Constant Time Memory Comparisons Are Important Hi Stephan, On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de> wrote: > Are you planning to send an update to your patch set? If yes, there is another > one which should be converted too: crypto/rsa-pkcs1pad.c. I just sent an update to this thread patching that, per your suggestion. Since these issues are expected to be cherry picked by their respective committer, I figure we can just pile on the patches here, listing the 0/6 intro email as each patch's parent. Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.