|
Message-Id: <201706062336.CFE35913.OFFLQOHMtSJFVO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 23:36:07 +0900 From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> To: igor.stoppa@...wei.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com, keescook@...omium.org, mhocko@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org Cc: paul@...l-moore.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, hch@...radead.org, labbott@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Make LSM Writable Hooks a command line option Igor Stoppa wrote: > For the case at hand, would it work if there was a non-API call that you > could use until the API is properly expanded? Kernel command line switching (i.e. this patch) is fine for my use cases. SELinux folks might want -static int security_debug; +static int security_debug = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE); so that those who are using SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config won't get oops upon boot by default. If "unlock the pool" were available, SELINUX=enforcing users would be happy. Maybe two modes for rw/ro transition helps. oneway rw -> ro transition mode: can't be made rw again by calling "unlock the pool" API twoway rw <-> ro transition mode: can be made rw again by calling "unlock the pool" API
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.