|
Message-Id: <201706062042.GAC86916.FMtHOOFJOSVLFQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:42:31 +0900 From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> To: igor.stoppa@...wei.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com, keescook@...omium.org, mhocko@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org Cc: paul@...l-moore.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, hch@...radead.org, labbott@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Make LSM Writable Hooks a command line option Igor Stoppa wrote: > Who decides when enough is enough, meaning that all the needed modules > are loaded? > Should I provide an interface to user-space? A sysfs entry? No such interface is needed. Just an API for applying set_memory_rw() and set_memory_ro() on LSM hooks is enough. security_add_hooks() can call set_memory_rw() before adding hooks and call set_memory_ro() after adding hooks. Ditto for security_delete_hooks() for SELinux's unregistration.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.