|
Message-ID: <214229a9-6e64-7351-1609-79c83d75d8c9@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:34:04 +0300 From: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> CC: <keescook@...omium.org>, <mhocko@...nel.org>, <jmorris@...ei.org>, <paul@...l-moore.com>, <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, <labbott@...hat.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Protectable Memory Allocator On 06/06/17 09:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 01:44:32PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: [..] >> As far as I know, not all CONFIG_MMU=y architectures provide >> set_memory_ro()/set_memory_rw(). You need to provide fallback for >> architectures which do not provide set_memory_ro()/set_memory_rw() >> or kernels built with CONFIG_MMU=n. > > I think we'll just need to generalize CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX and/or > ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX so there is a symbol to key this off. Would STRICT_KERNEL_RWX work? It's already present. If both kernel text and rodata can be protected, so can pmalloc data. --- igor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.