|
Message-ID: <20170603230048.52b7f111@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:00:48 +0100 From: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Matt Brown <matt@...tt.com> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Boris Lukashev <blukashev@...pervictus.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] security: tty: make TIOCSTI ioctl require CAP_SYS_ADMIN > TIOCSLCKTRMIOS That one I'm more dubious about > TIOCSLTC > TIOCSSOFTCAR tty_io.c also has a few and n_tty has a couple we'd want. > > would it be overkill to have a sysctl kernel.ttyioctlwhitelist.X where X > is one of the ioctls above? Why would anyone want to change the entries on that list Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.