[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHgaXdKqt3mZmPG78w+4g_17D8EQoBgAZeuqM+MMsQg2f7apsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:33:26 +0530
From: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, ast@...com, Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit
Hi Kees,
I already have ARMv5 and ARMv6 code written. I just haven't tested it
yet. Should i send the patch with those as well ?
Best,
Shubham Bansal
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Shubham Bansal
> <illusionist.neo@...il.com> wrote:
>> I would post them as soon as I test them on ARMv5 and ARMv6. If you
>> can help me with that, please let me know.
>
> Please post what you have: it would be better to see what you've got
> now in case additional changes are needed so you don't have to do it
> again on v5 and v6. Also, it means other people with real v5 and v6
> hardware could test for you if they were so inclined, and you won't
> need to be blocked on doing the tests in qemu.
>
> You can send it as an "RFC" in the subject, just to make sure people
> know it's not considered fully done. :)
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
