|
Message-ID: <20170512080741.GA32228@infradead.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 01:07:41 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Palash Bandyopadhyay <palash.bandyopadhyay@...exant.com>, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] syscalls: Verify address limit before returning to user-mode On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:35:21AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 08:15:49AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > And converting everything to ->read_iter()/->write_iter() means an insane > > amount of code churn, not to mention coping with random bogosities in > > semantics. ->read() and ->write() are going to stay around, pretty > > much indefinitely. > > But I don't think kernel users of them have to. I've been digging > through the calllers and will send an analysis to the list in a bit. Ok, here is the cleaned up list. The targets for in-kernel I/O are basically regular files on normal fs, block devices, pipes and sockets, with a few narrow exceptions and a few unclear cases. I've added a few maintainers to Cc to clarify, and the list is below: When looking at kernel_read/kernel_readv/kernel_write/__kernel_write instances, or vfs_read/vfs_readv/vfs_write/vfs_writev inststances with set_fs tricks most of them simply require a regular file on a "real" fs or a block device, pipe, socket: - various binary loaders: need to be regular files (+ on a "real" fs) - nandsim: expect a regular file or maybe a block device - code: expects a regular file - ecryptfs: expects a regular file - splice: can be a regular file or device file - security/keys: regular file - cachefiles: needs to be a regular file - coredump: usually a regular file, but possibly a pipe - acct: regular file - target: regular file - nfsd: regular file - lustre: regular file - f_mass_storage: regular file, or maybe block device - autofs: pipe - btrfs: regular file / pipe / socket - ima: regular file on specific file systems Then there are a few interesting ones with specific targets: - sysctl: regular file on procfs - mconsole: procfs as far as I can tell. Might be able to further narrow it down? - ashmem: regular file on shmem The nommu mmap code needs to read everything that wants to support a MAP_PRIVATE mmap, but as far as a I can tell: do a) address limits not matter for nommu, and b) I have no f***cking idea why it doesn't use readpage(s) to start with like the MMU code. And a few that I can't figure: - cx25821: no idea what this opens, need to confirm with the maintainers (on Cc) - 9p: not clear. looks like it might be sockets/pipes Last but not least we have a driver that's a complete mess: - series2002: /dev/tty* (drivers is in staging and needs to be rewritten using the proper in-kernel APIs anyway)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.