|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+avp7VAEAhRCH2fyQdqJo_yM2xkwxVbcO0eXeSscNNLA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 11:20:47 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mark protection_map as __ro_after_init On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com> wrote: > The protection map is only modified by per-arch init code so it can be > protected from writes after the init code runs. > > This change was extracted from PaX where it's part of KERNEXEC. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com> Thanks! Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> -Kees > --- > mm/mmap.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c > index f82741e199c0..3bd5ecd20d4d 100644 > --- a/mm/mmap.c > +++ b/mm/mmap.c > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void unmap_region(struct mm_struct *mm, > * w: (no) no > * x: (yes) yes > */ > -pgprot_t protection_map[16] = { > +pgprot_t protection_map[16] __ro_after_init = { > __P000, __P001, __P010, __P011, __P100, __P101, __P110, __P111, > __S000, __S001, __S010, __S011, __S100, __S101, __S110, __S111 > }; > -- > 2.12.2 > -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.