|
Message-ID: <20170509015829.iycvxxbyblfgklsg@treble> Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 20:58:29 -0500 From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:31:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 12:32:52PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> +#define REFCOUNT_EXCEPTION \ > >> + "movl $0x7fffffff, %[counter]\n\t" \ > >> + "int $"__stringify(X86_REFCOUNT_VECTOR)"\n" \ > >> + "0:\n\t" \ > >> + _ASM_EXTABLE(0b, 0b) > > > > Despite the objtool warnings going away, this still uses the exception > > table in a new way, which will confuse objtool. I need to do some more > > thinking about the best way to fix it, either as a change to your patch > > or a change to objtool. > > In that it's not a "true" exception? Right. And also that it doesn't need the "fixup" since it would return to the same address anyway. -- Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.