|
Message-Id: <03284709-498c-1e52-40f0-b19d20e56b8e@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:28:42 +0530 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au>, Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Daniel Cashman <dcashman@...roid.com>, Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Daniel Cashman <dcashman@...gle.com>, Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.linux@...il.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: mm: support ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS On Thursday 13 April 2017 12:22 PM, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Hi Aneesh, > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V > <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com> writes: >> >>> powerpc arch_mmap_rnd() currently uses hard-coded values - (23-PAGE_SHIFT) for >>> 32-bit and (30-PAGE_SHIFT) for 64-bit, to generate the random offset >>> for the mmap base address for a ASLR ELF. >>> >>> This patch makes sure that powerpc mmap arch_mmap_rnd() implementation >>> is similar to other ARCHs (like x86, arm64) and uses mmap_rnd_bits >>> and helpers to generate the mmap address randomization. >>> >>> The maximum and minimum randomization range values represent >>> a compromise between increased ASLR effectiveness and avoiding >>> address-space fragmentation. >>> >>> Using the Kconfig option and suitable /proc tunable, platform >>> developers may choose where to place this compromise. >>> >>> Also this patch keeps the default values as new minimums. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> >>> --- >>> * Changes since v2: >>> v2 can be seen here (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9551509/) >>> - Changed a few minimum and maximum randomization ranges as per Michael's suggestion. >>> - Corrected Kees's email address in the Reviewed-by line. >>> - Added further comments in kconfig to explain how the address ranges were worked out. >>> >>> * Changes since v1: >>> v1 can be seen here (https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2017-February/153594.html) >>> - No functional change in this patch. >>> - Dropped PATCH 2/2 from v1 as recommended by Kees Cook. >>> >>> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c | 7 ++++--- >>> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >>> index 97a8bc8..84aae67 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >>> @@ -22,6 +22,48 @@ config MMU >>> bool >>> default y >>> >>> +# min bits determined by the following formula: >>> +# VA_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT - CONSTANT >>> +# where, >>> +# VA_BITS = 46 bits for 64BIT and 4GB - 1 Page = 31 bits for 32BIT >> >> >> Where did we derive that 46 bits from ? is that based on TASK_SIZE ? > > Yes. It was derived from TASK_SIZE : > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h#L105 > That is getting update to 128TB by default and conditionally to 512TB -aneesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.