[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170407151249.b1d45218ad2f71bdc2c8f992@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:12:49 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Eddie Kovsky <ewk@...ovsky.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] provide check for ro_after_init memory sections
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 14:53:23 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > Eddie Kovsky (2):
> > module: verify address is read-only
> > extable: verify address is read-only
> >
> > include/linux/kernel.h | 2 ++
> > include/linux/module.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> > kernel/extable.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/module.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
>
> Andrew, do you have these in your mailbox (it went to lkml), or should
> I resend them directly to you? Since they depend on the
> __start_ro_after_init naming fixes in -mm, it seemed like it'd be best
> to carry these two patches there. If so, please consider them both:
>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> (And, from the thread on the module patch, Jessica has Acked that one too.)
Well I grabbed them, but the patches don't actually do anything - they
add interfaces with no users. What's the plan here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
