Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 12:25:53 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <>
To: Kees Cook <>,
Cc: Michael Leibowitz <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] task_struct: Allow randomized

On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 14:18 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:

> One question about formatting remains: should this patch indent all
> the
> randomized fields, due to the added anonymous struct, which would
> make
> this patch white-space huge, or should I leave the indentation level
> alone, to avoid massive churn? I opted for making the patch more
> readable, but can easily do the indentation...

It may make sense to do the indentation in a separate
patch, for readability reasons.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.