[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1491582353.8850.169.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 12:25:53 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Michael Leibowitz <michael.leibowitz@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] task_struct: Allow randomized
layout
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 14:18 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> One question about formatting remains: should this patch indent all
> the
> randomized fields, due to the added anonymous struct, which would
> make
> this patch white-space huge, or should I leave the indentation level
> alone, to avoid massive churn? I opted for making the patch more
> readable, but can easily do the indentation...
It may make sense to do the indentation in a separate
patch, for readability reasons.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
