[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170407015819.djxqzd2e5i3dd2dt@jeyu>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:58:19 -0700
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
To: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@...ovsky.org>
Cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] module: verify address is read-only
+++ Eddie Kovsky [05/04/17 21:35 -0600]:
>Implement a mechanism to check if a module's address is in
>the rodata or ro_after_init sections. It mimics the existing functions
>that test if an address is inside a module's text section.
>
>Functions that take a module as an argument will be able to verify that the
>module address is in a read-only section. The idea is to prevent structures
>(including modules) that are not read-only from being passed to functions.
>
>This implements the first half of a suggestion made by Kees Cook for
>the Kernel Self Protection Project:
>
> - provide mechanism to check for ro_after_init memory areas, and
> reject structures not marked ro_after_init in vmbus_register()
>
>Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@...ovsky.org>
Acked-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
