[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170323153204.4lxglq6jlvvxp6ev@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:32:04 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 08:14:44AM -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> Okay well then people are fine with a BUG_ON approach. I will do a
> next iteration tailored to that. I will also try to add the static
> inline suggestion from Peter.
Would it be possible, please, to refrain from top-posting when replying
on the ML?
You sometimes reply inline and after the text and sometimes at the top.
This subthread has both variants and it is really annoying to people
like me who try to follow the discussion.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
