|
Message-ID: <CAJcbSZEFWzPVfxVzOF5r1yywkgMObxOt8W+1efuTUsv+82FBpg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:29:28 -0700 From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Stanislav Kinsburskiy <skinsbursky@...tuozzo.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, He Chen <he.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, "David A . Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>, Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote: > Even though my name isn't Ingo, Linus keeps trying to get me to be the > actual maintainer of this file. :) How about (sorry about whitespace > damage): :D > > #ifdef CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION > movq PER_CPU_VAR(current_task), %rax > bt $63, TASK_addr_limit(%rax) > jc syscall_return_slowpath > #endif > > Now the kernel is totally unchanged if the config option is off and > it's fast and simple if the option is on. I like using bt for fast comparison. We want to enforce the address limit by default, not only when CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION is enabled. I tested this one: /* Check user-mode state on fast path return. */ movq PER_CPU_VAR(current_task), %rax btq $63, TASK_addr_limit(%rax) jnc 1f #ifdef CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION call syscall_return_slowpath jmp return_from_SYSCALL_64 #else movq $TASK_SIZE_MAX, %rcx movq %rcx, TASK_addr_limit(%rax) #endif 1: I saw that syscall_return_slowpath is supposed to be called not jumped to. I could just call verify_pre_usermode_state that would be about the same. If we want to avoid if/def then I guess this one is the best I can think of: /* Check user-mode state on fast path return. */ movq PER_CPU_VAR(current_task), %rax btq $63, TASK_addr_limit(%rax) jnc 1f call verify_pre_usermode_state 1: The check is fast and the call will happen only on corruption. What do you think? -- Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.