|
Message-ID: <CAJcbSZG6F3DsiBMjizTbzaccvU5_RKdspU06wQ8yi+JT+EW2Jw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:17:08 -0700 From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Stanislav Kinsburskiy <skinsbursky@...tuozzo.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, He Chen <he.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, "David A . Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>, Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote: > On 03/13/17 17:04, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 03/11/17 01:42, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>>> >>>> + /* >>>> + * Check user-mode state on fast path return, the same check is done >>>> + * under the slow path through syscall_return_slowpath. >>>> + */ >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION >>>> + call verify_pre_usermode_state >>>> +#else >>>> + /* >>>> + * Similar to set_fs(USER_DS) in verify_pre_usermode_state without a >>>> + * warning. >>>> + */ >>>> + movq PER_CPU_VAR(current_task), %rax >>>> + movq $TASK_SIZE_MAX, %rcx >>>> + cmp %rcx, TASK_addr_limit(%rax) >>>> + jz 1f >>>> + movq %rcx, TASK_addr_limit(%rax) >>>> +1: >>>> +#endif >>>> + >> >> How about simply doing... >> >> movq PER_CPU_VAR(current_task), %rax >> movq $TASK_SIZE_MAX, %rcx >> #ifdef CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION >> cmpq %rcx, TASK_addr_limit(%rax) >> jne syscall_return_slowpath >> #else >> movq %rcx, TASK_addr_limit(%rax) >> #endif >> >> ... and let the slow path take care of BUG. This should be much faster, >> even with the BUG, and is simpler to boot. >> > > In fact, we could even to the cmpq/jne unconditionally. I'm guessing > the occasional branch mispredict will be offset by occasionally touching > a clean cacheline in the case of an unconditional store. > > Since this is something that should never happen, performance doesn't > matter. Ingo: Which approach do you favor? I want to keep the fast path as fast as possible obviously. > > -hpa > > -- Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.