|
Message-ID: <CAJcbSZHQnS+THRy3B+OmZAotjC4CW-giv+i+YJKF36wOgSZtYQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:54:40 -0800 From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Stanislav Kinsburskiy <skinsbursky@...tuozzo.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, He Chen <he.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>, Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 01:44:56PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:09:55PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:24:53PM -0800, Thomas Garnier wrote: > >> > It would be simpler to wrap the call entirely, e.g. have: >> > >> > #ifdef CONFIG_WHATEVER >> > static inline void verify_pre_usermode_state(void) >> > { >> > if (segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS)) >> > __verify_pre_usermode_state(); >> > } >> > #else >> > static inline void verify_pre_usermode_state(void) { } >> > #endif >> >> That's utterly pointless - you've missed a detail. >> >> > > @@ -199,7 +215,10 @@ extern struct trace_event_functions exit_syscall_print_funcs; >> > > asmlinkage long SyS##name(__MAP(x,__SC_LONG,__VA_ARGS__)); \ >> > > asmlinkage long SyS##name(__MAP(x,__SC_LONG,__VA_ARGS__)) \ >> > > { \ >> > > + bool user_caller = has_user_ds(); \ >> > > long ret = SYSC##name(__MAP(x,__SC_CAST,__VA_ARGS__)); \ >> > > + if (user_caller) \ >> > > + verify_pre_usermode_state(); \ >> > >> > ... then we can unconditionally use verify_pre_usermode_state() here ... >> >> Look at this closely. has_user_ds() is called _before_ the syscall code >> is invoked. It's checking what conditions the syscall was entered from. >> If the syscall was entered with the user segment selected, then we run >> a check on the system state _after_ the syscall code has returned. > > Indeed; I clearly did not consider this correctly. > > Sorry for the noise. > No problem, I missed that reply so discard my question on the email few seconds ago. > Thanks, > Mark. -- Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.