|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+dZvZPnmWMVsgSL706m_mR+h7FGd1HS4TgKmXhYhA4Hw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:11:46 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add ability to find bad uses of vsprintf %p<foo> extensions On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:54:55 -0800 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote: > >> %pK was at least once misused at %pk in an out-of-tree module. >> This lead to some security concerns. Add the ability to track >> single and multiple line statements for misuses of %p<foo>. > > Should we also do this? Ah yes, good idea. Maybe "...when adding/removing new conversion..." ? -Kees > > --- a/lib/vsprintf.c~checkpatch-add-ability-to-find-bad-uses-of-vsprintf-%pfoo-extensions-fix > +++ a/lib/vsprintf.c > @@ -1477,6 +1477,9 @@ int kptr_restrict __read_mostly; > * by an extra set of alphanumeric characters that are extended format > * specifiers. > * > + * Please update scripts/checkpatch.pl when adding new conversion characters. > + * (search for "check for vsprintf extension"). > + * > * Right now we handle: > * > * - 'F' For symbolic function descriptor pointers with offset > _ > -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.