[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <372bb698-2078-93f4-72c4-9e430aa09ff9@digikod.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:13:23 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski
<luto@...capital.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Drysdale
<drysdale@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] bpf: Add a Landlock sandbox example
On 22/02/2017 02:26, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Add a basic sandbox tool to create a process isolated from some part of
> the system. This sandbox create a read-only environment. It is only
> allowed to write to a character device such as a TTY:
>
> # :> X
> # echo $?
> 0
> # ./samples/bpf/landlock1 /bin/sh -i
> Launching a new sandboxed process.
> # :> Y
> cannot create Y: Operation not permitted
>
> Changes since v4:
> * write Landlock rule in C and compiled it with LLVM
> * remove cgroup handling
> * remove path handling: only handle a read-only environment
> * remove errno return codes
>
> Changes since v3:
> * remove seccomp and origin field: completely free from seccomp programs
> * handle more FS-related hooks
> * handle inode hooks and directory traversal
> * add faked but consistent view thanks to ENOENT
> * add /lib64 in the example
> * fix spelling
> * rename some types and definitions (e.g. SECCOMP_ADD_LANDLOCK_RULE)
>
> Changes since v2:
> * use BPF_PROG_ATTACH for cgroup handling
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
> ---
> samples/bpf/.gitignore | 32 ++++++++++++++
> samples/bpf/Makefile | 4 ++
> samples/bpf/bpf_load.c | 26 +++++++++--
> samples/bpf/landlock1_kern.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
> samples/bpf/landlock1_user.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 samples/bpf/.gitignore
> create mode 100644 samples/bpf/landlock1_kern.c
> create mode 100644 samples/bpf/landlock1_user.c
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/.gitignore b/samples/bpf/.gitignore
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a7562a5ef4c2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/samples/bpf/.gitignore
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +fds_example
> +lathist
> +lwt_len_hist
> +map_perf_test
> +offwaketime
> +sampleip
> +sockex1
> +sockex2
> +sockex3
> +sock_example
> +spintest
> +tc_l2_redirect
> +test_cgrp2_array_pin
> +test_cgrp2_attach
> +test_cgrp2_attach2
> +test_cgrp2_sock
> +test_cgrp2_sock2
> +test_current_task_under_cgroup
> +test_lru_dist
> +test_overhead
> +test_probe_write_user
> +trace_event
> +trace_output
> +tracex1
> +tracex2
> +tracex3
> +tracex4
> +tracex5
> +tracex6
> +xdp1
> +xdp2
> +xdp_tx_iptunnel
Please ignore this hunk, it was part of another patch series…
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
