|
Message-ID: <20170220091417.14b21484@xeon-e3> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:14:17 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> To: "Eddie Kovsky" <ewk@...ovsky.org> Cc: <jeyu@...hat.com>, <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, <keescook@...omium.org>, "KY Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, "Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, "Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] module: verify address is read-only On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:58:42 -0800 "Eddie Kovsky" <ewk@...ovsky.org> wrote: > Implement a mechanism to check if a module's address is in > the rodata or ro_after_init sections. It mimics the exsiting functions > that test if an address is inside a module's text section. > > Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@...ovsky.org> I don't see the point of this for many of the hyper-v functions. They are only called from a small number of places, and this can be validated by code inspection. Adding this seems just seems to be code bloat to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.