|
Message-ID: <CALMp9eT_G_Mhsk1k7Xc8L+bnpFwTUoC=ae4LhB1ppqKynKEQ9g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:49:42 -0800 From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com> To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, He Chen <he.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, lguest@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: VMX: Simplify segment_base Can we use the read-only GDT here? When expanding the virtual address for 64-bit system descriptors, isn't it sufficient to check (d->s == 0 && d->type != 0)? On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> wrote: > The KVM segment_base function is confusing. This patch replaces integers > with appropriate flags, simplify constructs and add comments. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> > --- > Based on next-20170213 > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > index 99167f20bc34..edb8326108dd 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -2062,25 +2062,35 @@ static unsigned long segment_base(u16 selector) > struct desc_struct *d; > unsigned long table_base; > unsigned long v; > + u32 high32; > > - if (!(selector & ~3)) > + if (!(selector & ~SEGMENT_RPL_MASK)) > return 0; > > - table_base = get_current_gdt_rw_vaddr(); > - > - if (selector & 4) { /* from ldt */ > + /* LDT selector */ > + if ((selector & SEGMENT_TI_MASK) == SEGMENT_LDT) { > u16 ldt_selector = kvm_read_ldt(); > > - if (!(ldt_selector & ~3)) > + if (!(ldt_selector & ~SEGMENT_RPL_MASK)) > return 0; > > table_base = segment_base(ldt_selector); > + } else { > + table_base = get_current_gdt_rw_vaddr(); > } > - d = (struct desc_struct *)(table_base + (selector & ~7)); > + > + d = (struct desc_struct *)table_base + (selector >> 3); > v = get_desc_base(d); > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > - if (d->s == 0 && (d->type == 2 || d->type == 9 || d->type == 11)) > - v |= ((unsigned long)((struct ldttss_desc64 *)d)->base3) << 32; > + /* > + * Extend the virtual address if we have a system descriptor entry for > + * LDT or TSS (available or busy). > + */ > + if (d->s == 0 && (d->type == DESC_LDT || d->type == DESC_TSS || > + d->type == 11/*Busy TSS */)) { > + high32 = ((struct ldttss_desc64 *)d)->base3; > + v |= (u64)high32 << 32; > + } > #endif > return v; > } > -- > 2.11.0.483.g087da7b7c-goog >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.