[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201702132029.HJD35443.HFQFVOJOFLtOMS@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:29:24 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: jmorris@...ei.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] security: mark nf ops in SELinux and Smack as __ro_after_init
James Morris wrote:
> Both SELinux and Smack register Netfilter operations during init,
> which then don't change. Mark these ops as __ro_after_init.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
This patch breaks CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y + SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config case,
doesn't it? Although I heard that SELinux is planning to remove CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE,
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE is valid as of current linux-security.git#next .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
