|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702111222340.3734@nanos> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:00:16 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Jess Frazelle <me@...sfraz.com> cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, "open list:IRQ SUBSYSTEM" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] irq: set {msi_domain,syscore}_ops as __ro_after_init On Sat, 11 Feb 2017, Jess Frazelle wrote: > On February 11, 2017 1:14:52 AM PST, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote: > >The same is true for cpuhotunplug operations. > > This makes sense. Will remove. That's true for all other patches touching sysops as well. But instead of giving up I'd recommend to look into the following: Go through all callsites which use un/register_syscore_ops() and figure out how many of them are possibly called post init. From a quick grep I can only find the KVM module, but there might be more. Lets assume it's KVM only. So you could do the following: Put something like this into virt/kvm/kvm_main.c, which is a builtin file static struct syscore_ops ops __ro_after_init = { .... }; int __init foo() { register_ops(&ops); } and because we know that kvm is single instance you can just have: static struct syscore_ops *kvm_ops; void kvm_set_sysop(*vmx_ops) { kvm_ops = ops; } and then have the kvm_syscore callbacks: static callback() { if (kvm_ops) kvm_ops->callback() } Sanity checks and serialization omitted. Then switch kvm_exit/init over to it. After that you can make all syscore_ops __ro_after_init, remove the export from (un)register_syscore_ops() and make that __init. Not much of an effort and probably worth the trouble. Thanks, tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.