|
Message-ID: <87efzag2fs.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:27:51 +1100 From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: dcashman@...gle.com, bhupesh.linux@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org, Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>, Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au>, Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>, Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org>, Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>, Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, Daniel Cashman <dcashman@...roid.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc: mm: support ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com> writes: > powerpc: arch_mmap_rnd() uses hard-coded values, (23-PAGE_SHIFT) for > 32-bit and (30-PAGE_SHIFT) for 64-bit, to generate the random offset > for the mmap base address. > > This value represents a compromise between increased > ASLR effectiveness and avoiding address-space fragmentation. > Replace it with a Kconfig option, which is sensibly bounded, so that > platform developers may choose where to place this compromise. > Keep default values as new minimums. > > This patch makes sure that now powerpc mmap arch_mmap_rnd() approach > is similar to other ARCHs like x86, arm64 and arm. > > Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.com> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> > Cc: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de> > Cc: Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au> > Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org> > Cc: Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org> > Cc: Scott Wood <oss@...error.net> > Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org> > Cc: Daniel Cashman <dcashman@...roid.com> > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> > --- > Changes since v1: > v1 can be seen here (https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2017-February/153594.html) > - No functional change in this patch. > - Added R-B from Kees. > - Dropped PATCH 2/2 from v1 as recommended by Kees Cook. Thanks for v2. But I replied to your v1 with some comments, did you see them? cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.