|
Message-ID: <20170203182648.GB26578@leverpostej> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 18:26:49 +0000 From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] arch: Rename CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA and CONFIG_DEBUG_MODULE_RONX On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:52:22AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > > Both of these options are poorly named. The features they provide are > necessary for system security and should not be considered debug only. > Change the name to something that accurately describes what these > options do. > > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> As with patch 1, this looks good to me. FWIW: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug > index 939815e..560a8d8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ config DEBUG_WX > If in doubt, say "Y". > > config DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA > - depends on DEBUG_RODATA > + depends on STRICT_KERNEL_RWX > bool "Align linker sections up to SECTION_SIZE" > help > If this option is enabled, sections that may potentially be marked as > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c > index 94b62c1..67f9cb9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void __kprobes *patch_map(void *addr, int fixmap) > bool module = !core_kernel_text(uintaddr); > struct page *page; > > - if (module && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX)) > + if (module && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX)) > page = vmalloc_to_page(addr); > else if (!module) > page = pfn_to_page(PHYS_PFN(__pa(addr))); Since CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX is mandatory for arm64, we should be able to simplify this, but that can wait for a later patch. Thanks, Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.