[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1701242255570.2743@ja.home.ssi.bg>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:14:29 +0200 (EET)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
keescook@...omium.org, elena.reshetova@...el.com, ishkamiel@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: free ip_vs_dest structs when refcnt=0
Hello,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, David Windsor wrote:
> Currently, the ip_vs_dest cache frees ip_vs_dest objects when their reference
> count becomes < 0. Aside from not being semantically sound, this is problematic
> for the new type refcount_t, which will be introduced shortly in a separate patch.
> refcount_t is the new kernel type for holding reference counts, and provides
> overflow protection and a constrained interface relative to atomic_t (the type
> currently being used for kernel reference counts).
>
> Per Juilan Anastasov: "The problem is that dest_trash currently holds deleted
Julian
> dests (unlinked from RCU lists) with refcnt=0." Changing dest_trash to hold
> dest with refcnt=1 will allow us to free ip_vs_dest structs when their refcnt=0,
> in ip_vs_dest_put_and_free().
Too long lines, should be up to 75 columns as per
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
Check with: scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict /tmp/file.patch
> Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
> ---
> include/net/ip_vs.h | 2 +-
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 4 +---
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> index 55e0169..6b5492e 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> @@ -711,7 +711,6 @@ ip_vs_trash_get_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, int dest_af,
> dest->vport == svc->port))) {
> /* HIT */
> list_del(&dest->t_list);
> - ip_vs_dest_hold(dest);
> goto out;
> }
> }
The changes look ok to me but as this is a net-next
material I also prefer some comments in the code to be updated:
- "be 0, so we simply release them here" before ip_vs_trash_cleanup
should become "be 1, so we simply release them here".
- "dest lives in trash with[out] reference" in __ip_vs_del_dest
When sending v2 for net-next please also CC:
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org
I'll ack the next version after some tests...
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
