|
Message-ID: <20170119162702.GE17183@fieldses.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:27:02 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@...mni.ethz.ch>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Make static usermode helper binaries constant On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 01:03:21PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:29:19PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:19:11AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:13:47AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:25:55PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:50:31PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > There are a number of usermode helper binaries that are "hard coded" in > > > > > > the kernel today, so mark them as "const" to make it harder for someone > > > > > > to change where the variables point to. > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > --- a/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c > > > > > > @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ static struct completion unload_sem; > > > > > > */ > > > > > > static int pnp_dock_event(int dock, struct pnp_docking_station_info *info) > > > > > > { > > > > > > + static char const sbin_pnpbios[] = "/sbin/pnpbios"; > > > > > > char *argv[3], **envp, *buf, *scratch; > > > > > > int i = 0, value; > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ static int pnp_dock_event(int dock, struct pnp_docking_station_info *info) > > > > > > * integrated into the driver core and use the usual infrastructure > > > > > > * like sysfs and uevents > > > > > > */ > > > > > > - argv[0] = "/sbin/pnpbios"; > > > > > > + argv[0] = (char *)sbin_pnpbios; > > > > > > > > > > So here and elsewhere, can attackers write to argv[0] instead of to the > > > > > memory where the string lives? > > > > > > > > Yes, they could, it would be a very "tight" race to do that (have to > > > > write after the assignment and before the call_usermodehelper_exec() > > > > runs). However, the kernel does not run argv[0], it just passes it to > > > > the binary you specify in path, so for this example, the correct program > > > > would still be run by the kernel. > > > > > > In this case it's argv[0] that will be passed to call_usermodehelper as > > > path, but.... OK, this argv array and the various function call > > > arguments are all just data on the stack, so I guess it's all about > > > equivalent. > > > > Kind of, nice catch, I'll change the call to usermodehelper to use > > sbin_pnpbios here, as that's the right thing to do. > > Oops, no, the patch was doing the right thing here, you missed the next > chunk of the patch: Oh, got it, thanks. --b. > > > @@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ static int pnp_dock_event(int dock, struct pnp_docking_station_info *info) > info->location_id, info->serial, info->capabilities); > envp[i] = NULL; > > - value = call_usermodehelper(argv [0], argv, envp, UMH_WAIT_EXEC); > + value = call_usermodehelper(sbin_pnpbios, argv, envp, UMH_WAIT_EXEC); > kfree(buf); > kfree(envp); > return 0; > > > So it's ok. > > thanks, > > greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.