|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJRNuLR+Ekt26fxkg5wCkEv5fv-4B7=rt78OfRHN_w1Jw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:09:31 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, minipli@...linux.so, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>, "benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce the initify gcc plugin On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:23:03 -0800 > Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:19:10 -0800 >> > Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: >> > >> >> FWIW, it still seems to me that these aren't false positives: >> >> >> >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x1b1): Section mismatch in >> >> reference from the function uncore_pci_exit.part.22() to the function >> >> .init.text:uncore_free_pcibus_map() >> >> The function uncore_pci_exit.part.22() references >> >> the function __init uncore_free_pcibus_map(). >> >> This is often because uncore_pci_exit.part.22 lacks a __init >> >> annotation or the annotation of uncore_free_pcibus_map is wrong. > > Thanks for the report, you can find the fix here: > https://github.com/ephox-gcc-plugins/initify/commit/5d93a54badd9751b79ef67ce8a8b4081fea37547 Awesome! Thanks, that eliminated almost all of the warnings. I'm still seeing this: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1087e7): Section mismatch in reference from the function rebind_subsystems() to the variable .init.rodata.str:__func__.4400 The function rebind_subsystems() references the variable __initconst __func__.4400. This is often because rebind_subsystems lacks a __initconst annotation or the annotation of __func__.4400 is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x13789d): Section mismatch in reference from the function register_ftrace_export() to the variable .init.rodata.str:__func__.4251 The function register_ftrace_export() references the variable __initconst __func__.4251. This is often because register_ftrace_export lacks a __initconst annotation or the annotation of __func__.4251 is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x139d24): Section mismatch in reference from the function tracepoint_printk_sysctl() to the variable .init.rodata.str:__func__.4251 The function tracepoint_printk_sysctl() references the variable __initconst __func__.4251. This is often because tracepoint_printk_sysctl lacks a __initconst annotation or the annotation of __func__.4251 is wrong. I haven't taken a close look yet, but I assume these are from the const strings in these functions? -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.