|
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzVnRZbGMKZ5ppOJRDTtpzFjEN3LDRZZjCcm2bKW731qg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:05:34 -0800 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] x86/mm/KASLR: Remap GDTs at fixed location On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote: > > Hmm. I bet that if we preset the accessed bits in all the segments > then we don't need it to be writable in general. I'm not sure that this is architecturally safe. IIRC, we do mark the IDT read-only - but that one we started doing due to the f00f bug, so we knew it was ok. I'm not sure you can do the same with the GDT/LDT. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.