|
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rr7A-ffz81N5jUzjg2k1UdM=-QLfcSDH_aOwrC-OFDpg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:43:40 +0100 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> To: George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net> Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>, "Daniel J . Bernstein" <djb@...yp.to>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>, Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>, Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] siphash: add cryptographically secure PRF On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:41 PM, George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net> wrote: > What are you testing on? And what input size? And does "33% improvement" > mean 4/3 the rate and 3/4 the time? Or 2/3 the time and 3/2 the rate? How that I've published my hsiphash implementation to my tree, it should be possible to conduct the tests back to back with nearly identical implementation strategies, to remove a potential source of error.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.