[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161117083718.GA3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:37:18 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Windsor <dave@...gbits.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Anvin, H Peter" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:34:48PM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> I have a coccinelle rule now that found about 15 usages of it.
Right, so can coccinelle detect the call_rcu/free call that is
conditional on the dec_and_test when its hidden inside a few function
calls?
Also, we should really have a "make spatch" target so that we can run
the thing concurrently with -j80 or somesuch, because as is coccinelle
is unbearably slow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
