|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLmx3XfXWS1XtUApmkxa=jBsSWvCW7-HpGxzvPOMkYH6g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:02:19 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: Add tests for LIST_POISON and ZERO_SIZE_PTR On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote: > This adds two tests, to check that a read or write to LIST_POISON1 and > ZERO_SIZE_PTR are blocked. Awesome. I think this addition! > The default values for both (256 and 16) typically fall in the range > of valid user space addresses. However in general mmap_min_addr is 64K, > which prevents user space from mapping anything at those addresses. > > However it's feasible that an attacker will be able to find a way to > cause an access at an offset from either value, and if that offset is > greater than 64K then they can access user space again. > > To simulate that case, in the test we create a user mapping at > mmap_min_addr, and offset the pointer by that amount. This gives the > test the greatest chance of failing (ie. an access succeeding). > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> > --- > drivers/misc/lkdtm.h | 2 ++ > drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h > index fdf954c2107f..cc207f7824f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ void lkdtm_SPINLOCKUP(void); > void lkdtm_HUNG_TASK(void); > void lkdtm_ATOMIC_UNDERFLOW(void); > void lkdtm_ATOMIC_OVERFLOW(void); > +void lkdtm_ACCESS_LIST_POISON(void); > +void lkdtm_ACCESS_ZERO_SIZE_PTR(void); > > /* lkdtm_heap.c */ > void lkdtm_OVERWRITE_ALLOCATION(void); > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c > index 182ae1894b32..35ce9c753b48 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c > @@ -5,7 +5,10 @@ > * test source files. > */ > #include "lkdtm.h" > +#include <linux/mman.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > +#include <linux/security.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > /* > * Make sure our attempts to over run the kernel stack doesn't trigger > @@ -146,3 +149,44 @@ void lkdtm_ATOMIC_OVERFLOW(void) > pr_info("attempting bad atomic overflow\n"); > atomic_inc(&over); > } > + > +static void test_poison_ptr(void *base, const char *desc) > +{ > + unsigned long *ptr, val, uaddr; > + > + uaddr = vm_mmap(NULL, mmap_min_addr, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, > + MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_FIXED, 0); > + if (uaddr >= TASK_SIZE) { > + pr_warn("Failed to allocate user memory, can't perform test.\n"); > + return; > + } > + > + /* > + * Creating a mapping and adding mmap_min_addr to the value is cheating > + * in a way. But it simulates the case where an attacker is able to > + * cause an access at a small offset from the base value, leading to a > + * user space access. If an arch doesn't define CONFIG_ILLEGAL_POINTER_VALUE > + * then it's likely this will work in the absence of other protections. > + */ > + ptr = mmap_min_addr + base; > + > + pr_info("attempting read of %s %p\n", desc, ptr); > + val = *ptr; > + pr_info("FAIL: Was able to read %s! Got 0x%lx\n", desc, val); > + > + pr_info("attempting write of %s %p\n", desc, ptr); > + *ptr = 0xdeadbeefabcd1234; I've traditionally used int pointers to avoid build warnings (as kbuild mentioned), see lkdtm_READ_AFTER_FREE() for example. > + pr_info("FAIL: Was able to write %s! Now = 0x%lx\n", desc, *ptr); > + > + vm_munmap(uaddr, PAGE_SIZE); > +} > + > +void lkdtm_ACCESS_LIST_POISON(void) > +{ > + test_poison_ptr(LIST_POISON1, "LIST_POISON"); > +} > + > +void lkdtm_ACCESS_ZERO_SIZE_PTR(void) > +{ > + test_poison_ptr(ZERO_SIZE_PTR, "ZERO_SIZE_PTR"); > +} > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c > index f9154b8d67f6..025a0ee8d8ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c > @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ struct crashtype crashtypes[] = { > CRASHTYPE(WRITE_KERN), > CRASHTYPE(ATOMIC_UNDERFLOW), > CRASHTYPE(ATOMIC_OVERFLOW), > + CRASHTYPE(ACCESS_LIST_POISON), > + CRASHTYPE(ACCESS_ZERO_SIZE_PTR), > CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_HEAP_SIZE_TO), > CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_HEAP_SIZE_FROM), > CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_HEAP_FLAG_TO), > -- > 2.7.4 > Thanks, I like this. Architectures with PAN/SMAP will be protected due to the "unexpected" direct user memory access, and architectures with a memory hole will trip over the bad memory area. And those without need to fix something. :) -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.