Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161110213535.GA3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:35:35 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, keescook@...omium.org,
	arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	h.peter.anvin@...el.com, will.deacon@....com,
	Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
	David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 01/13] Add architecture independent hardened
 atomic base

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:24:36PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>  include/asm-generic/local.h                |   3 +
>  include/asm-generic/local_wrap.h           |  63 +++++++++++

Seriously? Is there a single instance of local_t where any of this
matters?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.