Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161110204046.GW3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:40:46 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, keescook@...omium.org,
	arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	h.peter.anvin@...el.com, will.deacon@....com,
	Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
	David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 12/13] x86: implementation for HARDENED_ATOMIC

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:24:47PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>  static __always_inline void atomic_add(int i, atomic_t *v)
>  {
> +	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl %1,%0\n"
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDENED_ATOMIC
> +		     "jno 0f\n"
> +		     LOCK_PREFIX "subl %1,%0\n"
> +		     "int $4\n0:\n"
> +		     _ASM_EXTABLE(0b, 0b)


This is unreadable gunk.

> +#endif
> +
>  		     : "+m" (v->counter)
>  		     : "ir" (i));
>  }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.