Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41BF9F9E@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:31:04 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC v2 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC


>Done.  I added a line to the "HARDENED_ATOMIC Implementation" section of Documentation/security/hardened-atomic.txt describing the results of the benchmarks (no measurable performance difference).  You might want to add this line to the cover >letter as well.

Oh, one more thing. David you were planning to change a bit the wording on the racing issue in the documentation. Could you please still do it? Would be great to fix that before sending next rfc. 

@everyone: Now I finally cleaned up and repo and deleted all unneeded branches. The main working branch is *hardened_atomic_next* now (based on linux-next stable branch)

Best Regards,
Elena.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.