|
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41BF9F9E@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:31:04 +0000 From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com> To: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> CC: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com> Subject: RE: [RFC v2 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC >Done. I added a line to the "HARDENED_ATOMIC Implementation" section of Documentation/security/hardened-atomic.txt describing the results of the benchmarks (no measurable performance difference). You might want to add this line to the cover >letter as well. Oh, one more thing. David you were planning to change a bit the wording on the racing issue in the documentation. Could you please still do it? Would be great to fix that before sending next rfc. @everyone: Now I finally cleaned up and repo and deleted all unneeded branches. The main working branch is *hardened_atomic_next* now (based on linux-next stable branch) Best Regards, Elena.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.