|
Message-ID: <c16d6b6c-608e-c711-cc18-34b8d0082183@gruss.cc> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 23:49:57 +0200 From: Daniel Gruss <daniel@...ss.cc> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: rowhammer protection [was Re: Getting interrupt every million cache misses] On 29.10.2016 23:45, Pavel Machek wrote: > indy/sandy/haswell/skylake, so I'll just use the generic version...?) yes, generic might work, but i never tested it on anything that old... on my system i have >30 bit flips per second (ivy bridge i5-3xxx) with the rowhammer-ivy test... sometimes even more than 100 per second...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.