|
Message-ID: <20161028115545.GC5635@amd>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:55:45 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: rowhammer protection [was Re: Getting interrupt every million
cache misses]
Hi!
> > I agree this needs to be tunable (and with the other suggestions). But
> > this is actually not the most important tunable: the detection
> > threshold (rh_attr.sample_period) should be way more important.
> >
> > And yes, this will all need to be tunable, somehow. But lets verify
> > that this works, first :-).
>
> Yeah.
>
> Btw., a 56 NMI delay is pretty brutal in terms of latencies - it might
> result in a smoother system to detect 100,000 cache misses and do a
> ~5.6 msecs delay instead?
>
> (Assuming the shorter threshold does not trigger too often, of
> course.)
Yeah, it is brutal workaround for a nasty bug. Slowdown depends on maximum utilization:
+/*
+ * Maximum permitted utilization of DRAM. Setting this to f will mean that
+ * when more than 1/f of maximum cache-miss performance is used, delay will
+ * be inserted, and will have similar effect on rowhammer as refreshing memory
+ * f times more often.
+ *
+ * Setting this to 8 should prevent the rowhammer attack.
+ */
+ int dram_max_utilization_factor = 8;
| | no prot. | fact. 1 | fact. 2 | fact. 8 |
| linux-n900$ time ./mkit | 1m35 | 1m47 | 2m07 | 6m37 |
| rowhammer-test (for 43200000) | 2.86 | 9.75 | 16.7307 | 59.3738 |
(With factor 1 and 2 cpu attacker, we don't guarantee any protection.)
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.