|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLnuny-rEcck5SKnORqFU0=Jqt8Pzomv+KdL7JRrB=S5A@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:36:25 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com> Cc: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 13.1/13] lkdtm: add tests for atomic over-/underflow On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:41:34PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Reshetova, Elena >> <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote: >> > Thank you Kees! I applied the commit to our hardened_atomic_on_next branch and it will be included into the next rfc. >> >> Cool, thanks. I assume this should get atomic64_t and local_t tests as well? >> > > Yes, I'm currently compiling a build with atomic64_t and local_t tests added. > With the improved lkdtm macros its much easier to add the extra types, thank > you Kees! Sure thing! I may have yet-another patch for this, as I didn't like repeating the same things in three files whenever a new test was added. Moar macro magick! -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.