Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+uUH9fRbFSkVGeAc1Z6+oLHPLLFFvkU6KDC6nuDX-8Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:51:05 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>, AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>, 
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, 
	Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 12/13] x86: implementation for HARDENED_ATOMIC

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Reshetova, Elena
<elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
>>> +static __always_inline int __atomic_add_unless_wrap(atomic_wrap_t *v,
>>> +                                                 int a, int u)
>>> +{
>>> +     int c, old, new;
>>> +     c = atomic_read_wrap(v);
>>> +     for (;;) {
>>> +             if (unlikely(c == (u)))
>>> +                     break;
>>> +
>>> +             asm volatile("addl %2,%0\n"
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDENED_ATOMIC
>>> +                          "jno 0f\n"
>>> +                          "subl %2,%0\n"
>>> +                          "int $4\n0:\n"
>>> +                          _ASM_EXTABLE(0b, 0b)
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Is this a mistake? We don't need a check here.
>
>>Yes, this appears to be a mistake.
>
> Clear copy paste mistake. Fixed now. Thanks again!

What was the mistake here?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.