[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161026065654.19166-12-mic@digikod.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:56:47 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>, David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC v4 11/18] seccomp,landlock: Handle Landlock hooks per process hierarchy
The seccomp(2) syscall can be use to apply a Landlock rule to the
current process. As with a seccomp filter, the Landlock rule is enforced
for all its future children. An inherited rule tree can be updated
(append-only) by the owner of inherited Landlock nodes (e.g. a parent
process that create a new rule). However, an intermediate task, which
did not create a rule, will not be able to update its children's rules.
Changes since v3:
* remove the hard link with seccomp (suggested by Andy Lutomirski and
Kees Cook):
* remove the cookie which could imply multiple evaluation of Landlock
rules
* remove the origin field in struct landlock_data
* remove documentation fix (merged upstream)
* rename the new seccomp command to SECCOMP_ADD_LANDLOCK_RULE
* internal renaming
Changes since v2:
* Landlock programs can now be run without seccomp filter but for any
syscall (from the process) or interruption
* move Landlock related functions and structs into security/landlock/*
(to manage cgroups as well)
* fix seccomp filter handling: run Landlock programs for each of their
legitimate seccomp filter
* properly clean up all seccomp results
* cosmetic changes to ease the understanding
* fix some ifdef
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAGXu5j+qowiyQuhifOBtupfPxp6XevdgF08BW4yzkVDTCha0xA@mail.gmail.com
---
include/linux/landlock.h | 5 +++++
include/linux/seccomp.h | 8 +++++++
include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h | 1 +
kernel/fork.c | 13 +++++++++--
kernel/seccomp.c | 8 +++++++
security/landlock/lsm.c | 8 +++++--
security/landlock/manager.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/landlock.h b/include/linux/landlock.h
index 263be3cf0b48..72b4235d255f 100644
--- a/include/linux/landlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/landlock.h
@@ -74,5 +74,10 @@ struct landlock_hooks {
void put_landlock_hooks(struct landlock_hooks *hooks);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
+int landlock_seccomp_append_prog(unsigned int flags,
+ const char __user *user_bpf_fd);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
+
#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK */
#endif /* _LINUX_LANDLOCK_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
index e25aee2cdfc0..4a8ccc7ff976 100644
--- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
+++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
#include <linux/thread_info.h>
#include <asm/seccomp.h>
+#if defined(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) && defined(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK)
+#include <linux/landlock.h>
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER && CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK */
+
struct seccomp_filter;
/**
* struct seccomp - the state of a seccomp'ed process
@@ -18,6 +22,7 @@ struct seccomp_filter;
* system calls available to a process.
* @filter: must always point to a valid seccomp-filter or NULL as it is
* accessed without locking during system call entry.
+ * @landlock_hooks: contains an array of Landlock programs.
*
* @filter must only be accessed from the context of current as there
* is no read locking.
@@ -25,6 +30,9 @@ struct seccomp_filter;
struct seccomp {
int mode;
struct seccomp_filter *filter;
+#if defined(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) && defined(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK)
+ struct landlock_hooks *landlock_hooks;
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER && CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK */
};
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h b/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h
index 0f238a43ff1e..56dd692cddac 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
/* Valid operations for seccomp syscall. */
#define SECCOMP_SET_MODE_STRICT 0
#define SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER 1
+#define SECCOMP_ADD_LANDLOCK_RULE 2
/* Valid flags for SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER */
#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC 1
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 0690e43bdda5..d8af3ba554fa 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -510,7 +510,10 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
* the usage counts on the error path calling free_task.
*/
tsk->seccomp.filter = NULL;
-#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK
+ tsk->seccomp.landlock_hooks = NULL;
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK */
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP */
setup_thread_stack(tsk, orig);
clear_user_return_notifier(tsk);
@@ -1378,7 +1381,13 @@ static void copy_seccomp(struct task_struct *p)
/* Ref-count the new filter user, and assign it. */
get_seccomp_filter(current);
- p->seccomp = current->seccomp;
+ p->seccomp.mode = current->seccomp.mode;
+ p->seccomp.filter = current->seccomp.filter;
+#if defined(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) && defined(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK)
+ p->seccomp.landlock_hooks = current->seccomp.landlock_hooks;
+ if (p->seccomp.landlock_hooks)
+ atomic_inc(&p->seccomp.landlock_hooks->usage);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER && CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK */
/*
* Explicitly enable no_new_privs here in case it got set
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index e741a82eab4d..f967ddf9d4b5 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/tracehook.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/landlock.h>
/**
* struct seccomp_filter - container for seccomp BPF programs
@@ -493,6 +494,9 @@ static void put_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
void put_seccomp(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
put_seccomp_filter(tsk->seccomp.filter);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK
+ put_landlock_hooks(tsk->seccomp.landlock_hooks);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK */
}
/**
@@ -797,6 +801,10 @@ static long do_seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags,
return seccomp_set_mode_strict();
case SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER:
return seccomp_set_mode_filter(flags, uargs);
+#if defined(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) && defined(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK)
+ case SECCOMP_ADD_LANDLOCK_RULE:
+ return landlock_seccomp_append_prog(flags, uargs);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER && CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK */
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/security/landlock/lsm.c b/security/landlock/lsm.c
index b3c107244df9..572f4f7f9f19 100644
--- a/security/landlock/lsm.c
+++ b/security/landlock/lsm.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
+#include <asm/current.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h> /* enum bpf_reg_type, struct landlock_data */
#include <linux/cred.h>
#include <linux/err.h> /* MAX_ERRNO */
@@ -15,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h> /* FIELD_SIZEOF() */
#include <linux/landlock.h>
#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
+#include <linux/seccomp.h> /* struct seccomp_* */
#include <linux/types.h> /* uintptr_t */
/* hook arguments */
@@ -161,8 +163,10 @@ static int landlock_enforce(enum landlock_hook hook, __u64 args[6])
.args[5] = args[5],
};
- /* placeholder for seccomp and cgroup managers */
- ret = landlock_run_prog(hook_idx, &ctx, NULL);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
+ ret = landlock_run_prog(hook_idx, &ctx,
+ current->seccomp.landlock_hooks);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
return -ret;
}
diff --git a/security/landlock/manager.c b/security/landlock/manager.c
index f3f03b64ebef..56e99ccd5708 100644
--- a/security/landlock/manager.c
+++ b/security/landlock/manager.c
@@ -14,8 +14,11 @@
#include <linux/filter.h> /* struct bpf_prog */
#include <linux/kernel.h> /* round_up() */
#include <linux/landlock.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h> /* current_cred(), task_no_new_privs() */
+#include <linux/security.h> /* security_capable_noaudit() */
#include <linux/slab.h> /* alloc(), kfree() */
#include <linux/types.h> /* atomic_t */
+#include <linux/uaccess.h> /* copy_from_user() */
#include "common.h"
@@ -263,3 +266,51 @@ static struct landlock_hooks *landlock_append_prog(
put_landlock_rule(rule);
return new_hooks;
}
+
+/**
+ * landlock_seccomp_append_prog - attach a Landlock program to the current process
+ *
+ * current->seccomp.landlock_hooks is lazily allocated. When a process fork,
+ * only a pointer is copied. When a new hook is added by a process, if there is
+ * other references to this process' landlock_hooks, then a new allocation is
+ * made to contains an array pointing to Landlock program lists. This design
+ * has low-performance impact and memory efficiency while keeping the property
+ * of append-only programs.
+ *
+ * @flags: not used for now, but could be used for TSYNC
+ * @user_bpf_fd: file descriptor pointing to a loaded/checked eBPF program
+ * dedicated to Landlock
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
+int landlock_seccomp_append_prog(unsigned int flags, const char __user *user_bpf_fd)
+{
+ struct landlock_hooks *new_hooks;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ int bpf_fd;
+
+ if (!task_no_new_privs(current) &&
+ security_capable_noaudit(current_cred(),
+ current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN) != 0)
+ return -EPERM;
+ if (!user_bpf_fd)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (flags)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (copy_from_user(&bpf_fd, user_bpf_fd, sizeof(user_bpf_fd)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ prog = bpf_prog_get(bpf_fd);
+ if (IS_ERR(prog))
+ return PTR_ERR(prog);
+
+ /*
+ * We don't need to lock anything for the current process hierarchy,
+ * everything is guarded by the atomic counters.
+ */
+ new_hooks = landlock_append_prog(current->seccomp.landlock_hooks, prog);
+ /* @prog is managed/freed by landlock_append_prog() */
+ if (IS_ERR(new_hooks))
+ return PTR_ERR(new_hooks);
+ current->seccomp.landlock_hooks = new_hooks;
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
