|
Message-ID: <1477386248.2263.9.camel@cvidal.org> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:04:08 +0200 From: Colin Vidal <colin@...dal.org> To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: keescook@...omium.org, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>, Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 13/13] lkdtm: add tests for atomic over-/underflow On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 17:56 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:25:31PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > > > From: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com> > > > > This adds additional tests for modified atomic functions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com> > > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com> > > Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com> > > --- > > drivers/misc/lkdtm.h | 17 +++++++ > > drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c | 17 +++++++ > > 3 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h > > index cfa1039..224713a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h > > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h > > @@ -20,7 +20,24 @@ void lkdtm_HARDLOCKUP(void); > > void lkdtm_SPINLOCKUP(void); > > void lkdtm_HUNG_TASK(void); > > void lkdtm_ATOMIC_UNDERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_DEC_RETURN_UNDERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_SUB_UNDERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_SUB_RETURN_UNDERFLOW(void); > > void lkdtm_ATOMIC_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_INC_RETURN_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_ADD_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_ADD_UNLESS_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_INC_AND_TEST_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_UNDERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_DEC_RETURN_UNDERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_SUB_UNDERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_SUB_RETURN_UNDERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_INC_RETURN_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_ADD_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_ADD_RETURN_OVERFLOW(void); > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_SUB_AND_TEST(void); > > void lkdtm_CORRUPT_LIST_ADD(void); > > void lkdtm_CORRUPT_LIST_DEL(void); > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c > > index f336206..bd79a88 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c > > +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c > > @@ -128,30 +128,116 @@ void lkdtm_HUNG_TASK(void) > > schedule(); > > } > > > > -void lkdtm_ATOMIC_UNDERFLOW(void) > > -{ > > - atomic_t under = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MIN); > > - > > - pr_info("attempting good atomic increment\n"); > > - atomic_inc(&under); > > - atomic_dec(&under); > > - > > - pr_info("attempting bad atomic underflow\n"); > > - atomic_dec(&under); > > +#define ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(tag,fun) void lkdtm_ATOMIC_##tag(void) \ > > +{ \ > > + atomic_t atomic = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MIN); \ > > + \ > > + pr_info("attempting good atomic_" #fun "\n"); \ > > + atomic_inc(&atomic); \ > > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \ > > + \ > > + pr_info("attempting bad atomic_" #fun "\n"); \ > > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \ > > } > > > > -void lkdtm_ATOMIC_OVERFLOW(void) > > -{ > > - atomic_t over = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MAX); > > +#define ATOMIC_LKDTM_MAX(tag,fun,...) \ > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_##tag(void) \ > > +{ \ > > + atomic_t atomic = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MAX); \ > > + \ > > + pr_info("attempting good atomic_" #fun "\n"); \ > > + atomic_dec(&atomic); \ > > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \ > > + \ > > + pr_info("attempting bad atomic_" #fun "\n"); \ > > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \ > > +} > > > > - pr_info("attempting good atomic decrement\n"); > > - atomic_dec(&over); > > - atomic_inc(&over); > > +#define ATOMIC_LKDTM_LONG_MIN(tag,fun,...) \ > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_##tag(void) \ > > +{ \ > > + atomic_long_t atomic = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(LONG_MIN); \ > > + \ > > + pr_info("attempting good atomic_long_" #fun "\n"); \ > > + atomic_long_inc(&atomic); \ > > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \ > > + \ > > + pr_info("attempting bad atomic_long_" #fun "\n"); \ > > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \ > > +} > > > > - pr_info("attempting bad atomic overflow\n"); > > - atomic_inc(&over); > > +#define ATOMIC_LKDTM_LONG_MAX(tag,fun,...) \ > > +void lkdtm_ATOMIC_LONG_##tag(void) \ > > +{ \ > > + atomic_long_t atomic = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(LONG_MAX); \ > > + \ > > + pr_info("attempting good atomic_long_" #fun "\n"); \ > > + atomic_long_dec(&atomic); \ > > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \ > > + \ > > + pr_info("attempting bad atomic_long_" #fun "\n"); \ > > + TEST_FUNC(&atomic); \ > > } > > > > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_dec(x) > > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(UNDERFLOW,dec) > > +#undef TEST_FUNC > > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_dec_return(x) > > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(DEC_RETURN_UNDERFLOW,dec_return); > > +#undef TEST_FUNC > > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_sub(1,x) > > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(SUB_UNDERFLOW,sub); > > +#undef TEST_FUNC > > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_sub_return(1,x); > > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MIN(SUB_RETURN_UNDERFLOW,sub_return); > > +#undef TEST_FUNC > > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_inc(x); > > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MAX(OVERFLOW,inc); > > +#undef TEST_FUNC > > +#define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_inc_return(x); > > +ATOMIC_LKDTM_MAX(INC_RETURN_OVERFLOW,inc_return); > > Please note that this definition causes a compiler warning: > /home/akashi/arm/armv8/linaro/linux-aarch64/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c: In function 'lkdtm_ATOMIC_INC_AND_TEST_OVERFLOW': > /home/akashi/arm/armv8/linaro/linux-aarch64/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:222:55: warning: value computed is not used [-Wunused-value] > #define atomic_inc_and_test(v) (atomic_inc_return(v) == 0) > ^ > /home/akashi/arm/armv8/linaro/linux-aarch64/drivers/misc/lkdtm_bugs.c:204:22: note: in expansion of macro 'atomic_inc_and_test' > #define TEST_FUNC(x) atomic_inc_and_test(x); > There is the same issue with arm. Thanks, Colin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.